Batista v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Eugene G. Batista
Defendant: Dept. of Corrections, City of New York and Captain I. Mitchell
Case Number: 1:2018cv06848
Filed: July 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Louis L Stanton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued September 21, 2018, dismissing the complaint, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/21/2018) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package)(mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/21/2018) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 21, 2018 Mailed a copy of #9 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #8 Order of Dismissal, to Eugene G. Batista NYSID: 05188370L B&C No. 3491802073 Robert N. Davoren Center 11-11 Hazen Street East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (aea)
August 31, 2018 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of New York, I. Mitchell; re: amending #2 Complaint with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Eugene G. Batista. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc)
August 31, 2018 Filing 6 LETTER from E. Batista, dated 8/25/18 re: (ORDER TO AMEND) - Plaintiff notifies the Court that, on the Order to Amend, the defendant's name is totally wrong; and that the correct name of the defendant(incorrectly spelled I. Miller) is Captain I. Mitchell. Document filed by Eugene G. Batista.(sc)
August 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO AMEND. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set forth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 18-CV-6848 (CM). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed and cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 8/8/2018) (rjm)
August 8, 2018 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #5 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening) to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (rjm)
August 8, 2018 Mailed a copy of #5 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening), to Eugene G. Batista NYSID: 05188370L B&C No. 3491802073 Robert N. Davoren Center 11-11 Hazen Street East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (aea)
August 8, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (rjm)
August 2, 2018 Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application in Prisoner Case, to Eugene G. Batista NYSID: 05188370L B&C No. 3491802073 Robert N. Davoren Center 11-11 Hazen Street East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (vba)
August 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION IN PRISONER CASE: The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order and the prisoner authorization to the agency having custody of Plaintiff. That agency is directed to forward copies of Plaintiff's prison trust fund account for the past six months and to disburse the payments required under 28 U.S.C. 1915 to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and to include the above docket number on the disbursement before sending it to the Court. If Plaintiff is transferred to another facility, the current facility shall provide a copy of this order to the facility to which Plaintiff is transferred. The Clerk of Court is also directed to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Finally, it is Plaintiff's obligation to promptly submit a written notification to the Court if Plaintiff's address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/1/2018) (rdz)
August 1, 2018 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order Granting IFP Application in Prisoner Case, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (rdz)
July 30, 2018 Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Eugene G. Batista.(sac)
July 30, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against City of New York, Dept. of Corrections, I. Mitchell. Document filed by Eugene G. Batista.(sac)
July 30, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Eugene G. Batista.(sac)
July 30, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Batista v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dept. of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain I. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene G. Batista
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?