Lapa v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Plaintiff: David Lapa
Defendant: Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv07403
Filed: August 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Rockland
Presiding Judge: John F Keenan
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2018 Filing 12 LETTER MOTION for Conference -- Pre-motion conference to move, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), to transfer this action. addressed to Judge John F. Keenan from Indraneel Sur dated October 9, 2018. Document filed by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- McKinney Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Redline Comparison of Lapa Complaint to McKinney Complaint, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Sur, Indraneel)
October 9, 2018 Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Massage Envy, LLC, Corporate Parent ME Holding Corporation for Massage Envy Franchising, LLC. Document filed by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC.(Sur, Indraneel)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The conference in this case is adjourned from October 25 to December 6, 2018 at 11:00 am in Courtroom 20-C. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 12/6/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 20C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge John F. Keenan.) (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 10/9/2018) (jca)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Both parties consenting, Defendant's motion is GRANTED and Defendant's deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond is adjourned to October 19, 2018. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 9/19/2018) (jca)
September 19, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines: Massage Envy Franchising, LLC answer due 10/19/2018. (jca)
September 18, 2018 Filing 8 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge John F. Keenan from Indraneel Sur dated September 18, 2018. Document filed by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC.(Sur, Indraneel)
September 18, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Indraneel Sur on behalf of Massage Envy Franchising, LLC. (Sur, Indraneel)
September 5, 2018 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC served on 8/31/2018, answer due 9/21/2018. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, Authorized Agent of the Office of the Secretary of State. Document filed by David Lapa. (Dave, Ishan)
August 21, 2018 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Massage Envy Franchising, LLC. (dnh)
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by David Lapa. (Dave, Ishan)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Initial Conference set for 10/25/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge John F. Keenan. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 8/20/2018) (mro)
August 16, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Dave, Ishan)
August 16, 2018 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Ishan Dave. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: David Lapa; Massage Envy Franchising, LLC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted;. (jgo)
August 16, 2018 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Ishan Dave. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (jgo)
August 16, 2018 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John F. Keenan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo)
August 16, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
August 16, 2018 Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo)
August 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Massage Envy Franchising, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15456192)Document filed by David Lapa.(Dave, Ishan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lapa v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Represented By: Indraneel Sur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Lapa
Represented By: Ishan Dave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?