Rodriguez v. The City Of New York et al
Radhames Rodriguez |
The City of New York and Jane Doe |
1:2018cv07542 |
August 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
NewYork |
John G Koeltl |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. 1. Time to respond to the Complaint extended to 11/9/18. 2. Conference adjourned to 11/16/2018 at 4:30 p.m. SO ORDERED. The City of New York answer due 11/9/2018. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/10/2018) (rj) |
Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 11/16/2018 at 04:30 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl. (rj) |
Filing 8 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Peter W. Brocker dated September 10, 2018. Document filed by The City of New York.(Brocker, Peter) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Peter William Brocker on behalf of The City of New York. (Brocker, Peter) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: You are directed to appear tor a pretrial conference. to be held on Wednesday, October 31, 2018, in Courtroom 14A, at 4:30pm. before the Honorable John G. Koeltl. All requests for adjournments must be made in writing to the Court. For any further information, please contact the Court at (212) 805-0107. (Initial Conference set for 10/31/2018 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 14A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge John G. Koeltl.)(yv) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. The City of New York served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. Service was accepted by Inez Contreras, Docketing Clerk. Document filed by Radhames Rodriguez. (Joubin, Cyrus) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The City of New York. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Cyrus Joubin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: The City of New York; Jane Doe. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party text was omitted. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to City of New York, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Radhames Rodriguez. (Joubin, Cyrus) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Joubin, Cyrus) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Of New York, Jane Doe(in her official capacity), Jane Doe(individually). (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15468256)Document filed by Radhames Rodriguez.(Joubin, Cyrus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.