Dadlani v. Perez
Vivek Dadlani |
Ramon Perez |
John Doe, ABC Ltd. and XYZ, LLP |
1:2018cv07572 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
NewYork |
Vernon S Broderick |
Assault Libel & Slander |
09 U.S.C. ยง 203 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiff filed this action on August 20, 2018. (Doc. 1.) Since that time, Plaintiff has not filed an affidavit of service of the Complaint or taken any action demonstrating an intent to prosecute this action. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a letter on or before October 24, 2018, explaining why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff is informed that failure to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the Complaint. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 10/17/2018) (jca) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Cooper, Ryan) |
ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents Ramon Perez, John Doe, ABC Ltd., XYZ, LLP added. Party added pursuant to #1 Complaint,.Document filed by Vivek Dadlani. Related document: #1 Complaint,.(Cooper, Ryan) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Ryan John Cooper to RE-FILE re: Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reasons: all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF; John Doe, Esq, ABC, Ltd., and XYZ, LLP must all be added to CM ECF; the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected. Docket the event type Add Party for Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. **DO NOT USE GOOGLE CHROME OR SAFARI BROWSERS** Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Ryan John Cooper. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR -COMPLAINT against Ramon Perez. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15471853)Document filed by Vivek Dadlani.(Cooper, Ryan) Modified on 8/21/2018 (pne). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.