Reddy Raw, Inc. v. C & B Logistics LLC
Reddy Raw, Inc. |
C & B LOGISTICS LLC |
1:2018cv07744 |
August 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Edgardo Ramos |
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
49 U.S.C. ยง 14706 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #8 MOTION for Robert Schiller Crowder to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-15628715. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.>/B. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Robert Schiller Crowder to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-15628715. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Reddy Raw, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Affidavit Affidavit, #3 Proposed Order)(Crowder, Robert) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. C & B Logistics LLC served on 9/12/2018, answer due 10/3/2018. Service was accepted by Office of NY Secretary of State by Nancy Dougherty. Document filed by Reddy Raw, Inc.. (Scott, Courtney) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE re: Document No. #6 FIRST MOTION for Robert Schiller Crowder to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for Plaintiff. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California; the filing fee was not paid;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. Pay the filing fee using the event Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment found under the event list Other Documents. (wb) |
Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FIRST MOTION for Robert Schiller Crowder to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for Plaintiff. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Reddy Raw, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Standing, #2 Affidavit Affidavit, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Crowder, Robert) Modified on 9/12/2018 (wb). |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to C & B Logistics LLC. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Courtney Elizabeth Scott. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $22,800,000; County code Bronx. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $23,000; the County code has been modified to New York. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Courtney Elizabeth Scott. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: C & B LOGISTICS LLC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to C & B Logistics LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Reddy Raw, Inc.. (Scott, Courtney) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Reddy Raw, Inc..(Scott, Courtney) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Scott, Courtney) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C & B LOGISTICS LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15492686)Document filed by Reddy Raw, Inc..(Scott, Courtney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reddy Raw, Inc. v. C & B Logistics LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Reddy Raw, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Courtney Elizabeth Scott |
Represented By: | Robert Schiller Crowder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: C & B LOGISTICS LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.