Seidman v. Oath Inc.
| Helayne Seidman |
| Oath Inc. |
| 1:2018cv07822 |
| August 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties in the above captioned action, acting by means of their respective counsel, that the time for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond with respect to the Complaint in the above matter is hereby extended from October 25, 2018 to November 26, 2018. This is the parties' second stipulated extension of time. The parties are currently exchanging settlement offers and believe the additional time will help bring the case to a resolution. No other dates would be affected by the extension. SO ORDERED. Oath Inc. answer due 11/26/2018. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/25/2018) (rj)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Oath Inc.. (Golinveaux, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #8 Motion for Jennifer A. Golinveaux to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/24/2018) (rj)
|
| >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #8 MOTION for Jennifer A. Golinveaux to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-15602547. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (jc) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties in the above captioned action, acting by means of their respective counsel, that the time for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond with respect to the Complaint in the above matter is hereby extended from September 25, 2018 to October 25, 2018. This is the parties' first stipulated extension of time. No other dates would be affected by the extension. Oath Inc. answer due 10/25/2018. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/21/2018) (cf) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Jennifer A. Golinveaux to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-15602547. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Oath Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux, with Certificate, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Golinveaux, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Oath Inc.. (Foglia, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Oath Inc.. (pne) |
| Filing 5 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Filing 4 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review.(Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Oath Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Helayne Seidman. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Oath Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15500121)Document filed by Helayne Seidman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Liebowitz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Seidman v. Oath Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oath Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer A. Golinveaux |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Helayne Seidman | |
| Represented By: | Richard Liebowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
