Pan v. Nielsen et al
| Li Pan |
| Secretary of USDHS Kirstjen Nielsen, Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| Director of USCIS Lee Francis Cissna and Director, District 3 THOMAS CIOPPA |
| 1:2018cv08020 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/30/2018) (rj)
|
| Filing 18 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (Byars, Michael) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #13 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. RESPONDENTS' REQUEST IS GRANTED. THEIR ANSWER SHALL BE DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 24, 2018. THE INITIAL CONFERENCE IS RESCHEDULED TO JANUARY 8, 2018 AT 10:30 A.M. SO ORDERED. (Thomas Cioppa answer due 12/24/2018; Lee Francis Cissna answer due 12/24/2018; Kirstjen Nielsen answer due 12/24/2018) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/1/2018) (jca)
|
| Filing 16 LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Gang Zhou dated 10/01/2018 re: #13 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, and adjournment of conference addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Nelsy De La Nuez dated 9/28/2018. . Document filed by Li Pan. (Zhou, Gang) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 1/8/2019 at 10:30 AM before Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. (jca) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER, Earlier today, the Court ordered that, to the extent Plaintiff opposes Defendants' requests to, among other things, extend their time to answer, that response should be filed on or before October 3, 2018. ECF No. 14. In light of the October 3, 2018 conference, however, the Court now amends its order to require that Plaintiff file a response, if any, on or before October 1, 2018 at 12 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 10/1/2018) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/28/18) (yv)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER with respect to #13 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. To the extent plaintiff opposes this request, a response should be filed on or before October 3, 2018. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/28/2018) (jca)
|
| Filing 13 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, and adjournment of conference addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Nelsy De La Nuez dated 9/28/2018. Document filed by Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen.(De La Nuez, Nelsy) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 10/3/2018 (jca) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nelsy De La Nuez on behalf of Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (De La Nuez, Nelsy) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, Amended Complaint. Service was accepted by Haojun Li, Civil Clerk. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Li Pan. (Zhou, Gang) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, Amended Complaint. Thomas Cioppa served on 9/10/2018, answer due 10/1/2018; Lee Francis Cissna served on 9/10/2018, answer due 10/1/2018; Kirstjen Nielsen served on 9/10/2018, answer due 10/1/2018. Service was accepted by Haojun Li, Civil Clerk. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Li Pan. (Zhou, Gang) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/3/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 1306, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr.; and as further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/7/2018) (anc)
|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Gang Zhou. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 05:0552(a). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 05:0702. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Gang Zhou. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Li Pan; Kirstjen Nielsen; Lee Francis Cissna; Thomas Cioppa. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (sj) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #6 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus against THOMAS CIOPPA, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen.Document filed by Li Pan. Related document: #6 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus.(Zhou, Gang) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against THOMAS CIOPPA, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen.Document filed by Li Pan.(Zhou, Gang) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Gang Zhou to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason: the wrong event type was used to file the pleading. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 9/10/2018. (pne) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Kirstjen Nielsen, Lee. Francis Cissna, and Thomas Cioppa, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Li Pan. (Zhou, Gang) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Li Pan.(Zhou, Gang) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gang Zhou on behalf of Li Pan. (Zhou, Gang) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Brief Statement of the Cause of Action)(Zhou, Gang) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - COMPLAINT against THOMAS CIOPPA, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15522322)Document filed by Li Pan.(Zhou, Gang) Modified on 9/5/2018 (pne). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
