Rondevoo Technologies, LLC v. Matisse Corporation
Rondevoo Technologies, LLC |
Matisse Corporation |
1:2018cv08470 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Robert W Sweet |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Matisse Corporation. (pne) |
Filing 8 PRETRIAL ORDER: Initial Conference set for 12/4/2018 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 18C, U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Robert W. Sweet. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/28/2018) (rjm) |
Filing 7 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (vf) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Robert W. Sweet, Patent Judge. Judge George B. Daniels is no longer assigned to the case. (ma) |
Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Ranallo, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review.(Ranallo, Nicholas) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge George B. Daniels. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Nicholas Richard Ranallo to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): pdf case caption does not exactly match initial pleading caption;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated June 2017. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated June 2017 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Nicholas Richard Ranallo. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Rondevoo Technologies, LLC; Matisse Corporation. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Nicholas Richard Ranallo. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT AO 120 FORM PATENT/TRADEMARK. Notice to Attorney Nicholas Richard Ranallo to submit a completed AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark to court for review. Use the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents. (jgo) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Red Dragon Innovations, LLC for Rondevoo Technologies, LLC. Document filed by Rondevoo Technologies, LLC.(Ranallo, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Matisse Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rondevoo Technologies, LLC. (Ranallo, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Ranallo, Nicholas) Modified on 9/18/2018 (jgo). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matisse Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15582011)Document filed by Rondevoo Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Ranallo, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rondevoo Technologies, LLC v. Matisse Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rondevoo Technologies, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nicholas Richard Ranallo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Matisse Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.