Gordon v. Cornell University
Plaintiff: Ava Gordon
Defendant: Cornell University
Case Number: 1:2018cv08522
Filed: September 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Louis L Stanton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued September 26, 2018, dismissing the complaint, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/26/2018) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/26/2018: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (mro).
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/26/2018) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 26, 2018 Mailed a copy of #5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), #4 Order of Dismissal, to Ava Gordon P.O. Box 2060 Ann Arbor, MI 48106. (aea)
September 26, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/21/2018) (anc) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 21, 2018 Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application, to Ava Gordon P.O. Box 2060 Ann Arbor, MI 48106. (aea)
September 17, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Cornell University. Document filed by Ava Gordon.(anc) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/19/2018) (rdz).
September 17, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Ava Gordon.(anc) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/19/2018) (rdz).
September 17, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (anc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon v. Cornell University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ava Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cornell University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?