Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna
Petitioner: Roderick Reyes
Respondent: Superintendent Lamma and Superintendent LaManna
Case Number: 1:2018cv08724
Filed: September 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Referring Judge: Ona T Wang
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2018 Received Return Receipt of Mail Order by Certified Mail, as to Attorney General of the State of New York to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 1000 5, which was served by Certified Mail # 7017 3040 0000 9027 8042, on 10/28/2018. (vba)
October 29, 2018 Received Return Receipt of Mail Order by Certified Mail, as to Attorney General of NYS 28 Liberty Street NY NY 10005, which was served by Certified Mail # 7017 3040 0000 9027 7977, on 10/22/2018. (vba)
October 25, 2018 Received Return Receipt of Mail Order by Certified Mail, as to DA of NY One Hogan Place NY, NY 10013, which was served by Certified Mail # 7017 3040 0000 9027 7960. (vba)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Roderick Reyes at Greenhaven Correctional Facility P.O. Box 4000 Stormville, NY 12582 on 10/16/2018 Re: #4 Order to Answer, via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (sbr)
October 16, 2018 Mailed a copy of #4 Order to Answer, Attorney General of the State of New York to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005; and the District Attorney of New York County to One Hogan Place, New York, NY 10013 by Certified Mail # 7017 3040 0000 9027 7960; 7017 3040 0000 9027 7977 with Return Receipt Requested. (aea) Modified on 10/24/2018 (aea). Maield a Copy of #1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Attorney General of the State of New York to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005; and the District Attorney of New York County to One Hogan Place, New York, NY 10013 Certified Mail # 7017 3040 0000 9027 8035; 7017 3040 0000 9027 8042 with Return Receipt Requested. Modified on 10/24/2018 (aea).
October 15, 2018 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order to Answer to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (cf)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2254: Having examined this petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254, the Court hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order and of the petition on the Attorney General of the State of New York by certified mail to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005; and on the District Attorney of New York County by certified mail to One Hogan Place, New York, NY 10013. Within sixty days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve (1) an answer to the petition and (2) the transcripts and briefs identified in Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may file and serve reply papers, if any, within thirty days from the date he is served with Respondents answer. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 10/15/2018) (cf)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Habeas Corpus. Referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 10/15/2018) (ne)
October 15, 2018 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jc)
October 15, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Analisa Torres. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (jc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes v. Superintendent LaManna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent Lamma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent LaManna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roderick Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?