Dipp-Paz v. Facebook
Plaintiff: Alejandro Dipp-Paz
Defendant: Facebook
Case Number: 1:2018cv09037
Filed: October 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Alejandro Dipp-Paz consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Alejandro Dipp-Paz.(rdz)
October 2, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Facebook. Document filed by Alejandro Dipp Paz.(rdz)
October 2, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Alejandro Dipp Paz.(rdz)
October 2, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dipp-Paz v. Facebook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alejandro Dipp-Paz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Facebook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?