Dixon v. Cuomo
Plaintiff: Echo Westley Dixon
Defendant: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo
Case Number: 1:2018cv09069
Filed: October 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Louis L Stanton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2018 Mailed a copy of #4 Order of Dismissal, #5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), to Echo Westley Dixon Din No. 00-A-6365 Collins Correctional Facility P.O. Box 340 Collins, NY 14034-0340. (vba)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act's "three strikes" rule. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff continues to be barred from filing any civil action under the in forma pauperis (IFP) statute while a prisoner unless Plaintiff is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 10/9/2018) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice under the PLRA's "three-strike" rule. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff remains barred from filing any future action IFP while in custody, unless he is under imminent threat of serious physical injury. Id. The Clerk of Court is also instructed to terminate all other pending matters. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 10/9/2018) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 9, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (rjm)
October 4, 2018 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Echo W. Dixon; re: in Support of Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Document filed by Echo Westley Dixon. (sc)
October 2, 2018 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #1 Order to Show Cause - Unsigned. Document filed by Echo Westley Dixon. (vn)
October 2, 2018 Filing 1 UNSIGNED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Echo Westley Dixon. (vn)
October 2, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (vn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Echo Westley Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?