ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch v. Doshi et al
Plaintiff: ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch
Defendant: Nihar Parekh, Apoorva Doshi, Vishal Doshi, Atit Shah, Sanjay Shah, Hiren Shah, Gurudas Patwardhan, Shiraj Deshpande, Shrikrishna Sant, Wanlu Zeng, Alpesh Panchal and Nihar Parikh
Case Number: 1:2018cv09128
Filed: October 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Vernon S Broderick
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2018 Filing 22 LETTER addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from A. Doshi, dated 11/22/18 re: Plaintiff requests that the Court grant an extension of time, to 3/1/19, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, because he/she is in the process of discussing settlement with plaintiff. Document filed by Apoorva Doshi.(sc)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting #18 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Complaint, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Defendant, Wanlu Zeng dated November 27, 2018. Document filed by Wanlu Zeng. Application granted. So ordered. Wanlu Zeng answer due 12/28/2018. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/28/2018) (rjm)
November 28, 2018 Filing 20 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Atit Shah. (pc) (Main Document 20 replaced on 11/28/2018) (pc).
November 27, 2018 Filing 19 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to ATIT SHAH, re: #5 Complaint,. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
November 27, 2018 Filing 18 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #5 Complaint, addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Defendant, Wanlu Zeng dated November 27, 2018. Document filed by Wanlu Zeng.(Del Pizzo, Nancy)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #16 Letter, filed by Apoorva Doshi. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se Defendant. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Apoorva Doshi answer due 12/1/2018.) (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/7/2018) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
November 2, 2018 Filing 16 LETTER addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from A. Doshi, dated 11/1/18 re: Defendant A. Doshi requests that the Court grant an extension of thirty days, from 11/2/18 up to and including 12/1/18, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in order to review and respond to the claims and to engage legal counsel. Document filed by Apoorva Doshi.(sc)
October 30, 2018 Filing 15 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #14 Letter filed by Wanlu Zeng. ENDORSEMENT: APPLICATION GRANTED. Wanlu Zeng answer due 11/28/2018. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 10/30/2018) (mro)
October 26, 2018 Filing 14 LETTER addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Nancy A. Del Pizzo dated October 26, 2018 re: Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Document filed by Wanlu Zeng.(Del Pizzo, Nancy)
October 26, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nancy Ann Del Pizzo on behalf of Wanlu Zeng. (Del Pizzo, Nancy)
October 21, 2018 Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent ICICI Bank Limited, Other Affiliate ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited, Other Affiliate ICICI Securities Limited, Other Affiliate ICICI Lombard General Life Insurance Company Limited for ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch.(Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 9, 2018 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Wanlu Zeng served on 10/8/2018, answer due 10/29/2018. Service was accepted by Wanlu Zeng. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Apoorva Doshi. (sj)
October 5, 2018 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Wanlu Zeng. (sj)
October 5, 2018 Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Apoorva Doshi, re: #5 Complaint,. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Wanlu Zeng, re: #5 Complaint,. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to, re: #5 Complaint. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit) Modified on 10/5/2018 (sj).
October 5, 2018 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Shiraj Deshpande, Apoorva Doshi, Vishal Doshi, Alpesh Panchal, Nihar Parekh, Gurudas Patwardhan, Shrikrishna Sant, Atit Shah, Hiren Shah, Sanjay Shah, Wanlu Zeng. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Preliminary Forensic Report, #2 Exhibit B, Part 1, Borrowing Base Analysis, #3 Exhibit B, Part 2, Group Co. Numbers)(Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Wanlu Zeng, re: #1 Amended Complaint,. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Apoorva Doshi, re: #1 Amended Complaint,. Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Sabharwal, Rohit)
October 5, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
October 5, 2018 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Rohit Sabharwal. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Nihar Parikh. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error. (sj)
October 5, 2018 Civil Case Opening Fee Paid electronically via Pay.gov: for #5 Complaint,. Filing fee $ 400.00. Pay.gov receipt number 0208-15661801, paid on 10/04/2018. (pne)
October 5, 2018 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Rohit Sabharwal. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Nature of Suit code 370 (Other Fraud); Dollar Demand 36,000,000,000; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 470 (Racketeer/Corrupt Organization); the Dollar Demand has been modified to 9,999,000; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj)
October 5, 2018 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj)
October 5, 2018 Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj)
October 4, 2018 Filing 1 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - AMENDED COMPLAINT against ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch.Document filed by ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, Preliminary Forensic Report, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, Part 1, Borrowing Base Analysis, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, Part 2, Group Co. Numbers)(Sabharwal, Rohit) Modified on 10/5/2018 (sj).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch v. Doshi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nihar Parekh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apoorva Doshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vishal Doshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atit Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanjay Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hiren Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gurudas Patwardhan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shiraj Deshpande
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shrikrishna Sant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wanlu Zeng
Represented By: Nancy Ann Del Pizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alpesh Panchal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nihar Parikh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ICICI Bank Limited, New York Branch
Represented By: Rohit Sabharwal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?