Marten v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Juan Rafael Marten
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 1:2018cv09201
Filed: October 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: John G Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: As stated at the hearing today, the defendant will file its motion to dismiss by December 19, 2018. The plaintiff should respond by January 9, 2019. The defendant may then reply by January 21, 2019. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 12/19/2018, Responses due by 1/9/2019, Replies due by 1/21/2019.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/28/2018) (jca)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Adjourned to Wednesday, November 28, 2018, at 3:00pm. So Ordered. (Pre-Motion Conference set for 11/28/2018 at 03:00 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/19/18) (yv)
November 19, 2018 Filing 16 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from C.K. Lee dated 11/19/18. Document filed by Juan Rafael Marten.(Lee, C.K.)
November 16, 2018 Filing 15 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation.(Rothstein, Ronald)
November 15, 2018 Filing 14 LETTER MOTION for Conference re: #13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, to Discuss the Bases for a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Juan Rafael Marten, addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Ronald Y. Rothstein dated November 15, 2018. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation.(Rothstein, Ronald)
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: granting #12 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. 1. Time to respond to the Complaint adjourned to a date to be set at a pre-motion conference. 2. Pre-Motion Conference scheduled for 11/20/18 at 4:40 P.M. 3. Letter setting forth basis for motion should be submitted by 11/15/2018. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/13/2018) (ama)
November 13, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines:, Set/Reset Hearings:( Pre-Motion Conference set for 11/20/2018 at 04:30 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl.) (ama)
November 8, 2018 Filing 12 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to file letter request for pre-motion conference re: anticipated motion to dismiss Complaint, and adjourn deadline to answer the Complaint, addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Ronald Y. Rothstein dated November 8, 2018. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation.(Rothstein, Ronald)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #10 Motion for Adrianne K. Rosenbluth to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/7/2018) (ne)
November 6, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Adrianne K. Rosenbluth to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15873083. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Adrianne K. Rosenbluth, with Certificate, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenbluth, Adrianne)
November 6, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Hynes on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. (Hynes, Christopher)
November 6, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ronald Y. Rothstein on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. (Rothstein, Ronald)
November 6, 2018 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #10 MOTION for Adrianne K. Rosenbluth to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15873083. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (jc)
November 5, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: You are directed to appear for a pretrial conference. to be held on Tuesday, January 8, 2019, in Courtroom 14A, at 2:30pm, before the Honorable John G. Koeltl. All requests for adjournments must be made in writing to the Court. For any further information, please contact the Court at (212) 805-0107. (Initial Conference set for 1/8/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 14A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge John G. Koeltl.)(rro) Modified on 11/5/2018 (rro).
November 1, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Starbucks Corporation served on 10/22/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty (Secretary of State). Document filed by Juan Rafael Marten. (Lee, C.K.)
October 15, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne Melissa Seelig on behalf of Juan Rafael Marten. (Seelig, Anne)
October 9, 2018 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Starbucks Corporation. (pc)
October 9, 2018 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney C.K. Lee. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jurisdiction code 3 (Federal Question); Citizenship Plaintiff code 7 (NONE); Citizenship Defendant code 7 (NONE);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jurisdiction code has been modified to 4 (Diversity); the Citizenship Plaintiff code has been modified to 1 (Citizen of This State); the Citizenship Defendant code has been modified to 5 (Incorporated/Principal Place of Business-Other State);. (pc)
October 9, 2018 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc)
October 9, 2018 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc)
October 9, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
October 8, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Lee, C.K.)
October 8, 2018 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Starbucks Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Juan Rafael Marten. (Lee, C.K.)
October 8, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15677647)Document filed by Juan Rafael Marten.(Lee, C.K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marten v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Christopher Hynes
Represented By: Ronald Y. Rothstein
Represented By: Adrianne Kari Rosenbluth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Rafael Marten
Represented By: C.K. Lee
Represented By: Anne Melissa Seelig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?