Guo et al v. Nielsen et al
Mr. Chongyang Chen, Ms. Xiaoping Guo, Xiaoping Guo and Chongyang Chen |
Ms. Kirstjen Nielsen, Thomas Cioppa, Mr. Lee Francis Cissna, Director Lee Francis Cissna, Director Thomas Cioppa and Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen |
1:2018cv09396 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Valerie E Caproni |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 11/26/2018) (rjm) |
Filing 13 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (Nakajima, Simon) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Simon Nakajima on behalf of Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (Nakajima, Simon) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 12/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 10/25/2018) (jca) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint, Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Service was accepted by Haojun Li, Civil Clerk. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Xiaoping Guo, Chongyang Chen. (Zhou, Gang) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint served. Thomas Cioppa served on 10/17/2018, answer due 12/17/2018; Lee Francis Cissna served on 10/17/2018, answer due 12/17/2018; Kirstjen Nielsen served on 10/17/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. Service was accepted by Haojun Li, Civil Clerk. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Xiaoping Guo; Chongyang Chen. (Zhou, Gang) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen. (pc) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Kirstjen Nielsen, Lee. Francis Cissna, and Thomas Cioppa, re: #6 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Chongyang Chen, Xiaoping Guo. (Zhou, Gang) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Gang Zhou to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; the form used for the summons is not the official AO 440 Summons form. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Gang Zhou. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Kirstjen Nielsen, Lee Francis Cissna, Thomas Cioppa. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (pne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Gang Zhou. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction has been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Queens; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen.Document filed by Xiaoping Guo, Chongyang Chen.(Zhou, Gang) |
Filing 5 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Kirstjen Nielsen, Lee Francis Cissna, and Thomas Cioppa, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Chongyang Chen, Xiaoping Guo. (Zhou, Gang) Modified on 10/16/2018 (pne). |
Filing 4 FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Chongyang Chen, Xiaoping Guo.(Zhou, Gang) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Brief Statement of the Cause of Action)(Zhou, Gang) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gang Zhou on behalf of Chongyang Chen, Xiaoping Guo. (Zhou, Gang) |
Filing 1 FIRST COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Thomas Cioppa, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15747628).Document filed by Xiaoping Guo, Chongyang Chen.(Zhou, Gang) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.