Feliciano v. Lee
Petitioner: Israel Feliciano
Respondent: Supt. William Lee
Case Number: 1:2018cv09591
Filed: October 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Barbara C Moses
Referring Judge: Gregory H Woods
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Received Return Receipt of Mail Order by Certified Mail, as to Attorney General NYS 28 Liberty Street New York NY 10005, which was served by Certified Mail # 7017 3040 0000 9027 8486, on 11/13/2018. (vba)
November 7, 2018 Mailed a copy of #7 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, #6 Order to Answer,,, to Israel Feliciano Din No. 10-A-5448 Eastern NY Correctional Facility P.O. Box 338 Napanoch, NY 12458-0338 by Certified Mail # 7016 2070 0001 1546 9504 with Return Receipt Requested. (Daniels, Anthony)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Israel Feliciano DIN No. 10-A-5448 at Eastern NY Correctional Facility P.O. Box 338 Napanoch, NY 12458-0338 on 11/6/2018 Re: #6 Order to Answer, via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (sbr)
November 6, 2018 Mailed a copy of #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #6 Order to Answer, to Attorney General of the State of New York by certified mail 7017 3040 0000 9027 8486 to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005; and on the District Attorney of Bronx County by certified mail 7017 3040 0000 9027 8493 to 198 E. 161st Street, Bronx, NY 10451. (vba) Modified on 11/6/2018 (vba).
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Habeas Corpus. Referred to Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 11/5/2018) (mro)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2254: Having examined this petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254, the Court hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order and of the petition on the Attorney General of the State of New York by certified mail to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York, 10005; and on the District Attorney of Bronx County by certified mail to 198 E. 161st Street, Bronx, NY 10451. Within sixty days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve (1) an answer to the petition and (2) the transcripts and briefs identified in Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may file and serve reply papers, if any, within thirty days from the date he is served with Respondent's answer. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 11/5/2018) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
November 5, 2018 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (ma)
November 5, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (ma)
October 23, 2018 Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application to Israel Feliciano DIN No. 10-A-5448 Eastern NY Correctional Facility P.O. Box 338 Napanoch, NY 12458-0338. (vba)
October 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/22/2018) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 18, 2018 Filing 3 LETTER from Israel Feliciano re: Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Document filed by Israel Feliciano.(sac)
October 18, 2018 Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Document filed by Israel Feliciano.(sac)
October 18, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Israel Feliciano.(sac)
October 18, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feliciano v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Supt. William Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Israel Feliciano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?