Walgreen CO et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
| Walgreen CO, The Kroger Co., H-E-B LLP and H-E-B L.P. |
| Endo International PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Novartis AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis Corporation |
| 1:2018cv09861 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Alvin K Hellerstein |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 15 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 39
SCHEDULING ORDER granting (240 in 18-cv-04361) Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants file oppositions to Plaintiffs' motions for class certification: April 2, 2021. Plaintiffs file replies in further support of motions for class certification: May 12, 2021. SO ORDERED., (Deposition due by 8/17/2020., Responses due by 4/2/2021, Replies due by 5/12/2021.) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 3/18/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing 38
HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 3/6/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing 37
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). filed by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, #17 MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). filed by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation., Motions terminated: #18 MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). filed by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, #17 MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). filed by Par Pharmaceutical Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Defendants' partial motion to dismiss is granted. DPPs' per se Section 1 claim is dismissed. Walgreen Co. and the Kroger Co.'s claims for injunctive relief are dismissed. The following end-payor claims are dismissed: a. Statutory antitrust claims in the following jurisdictions with a statute of limitations three years or shorter: Kansas, Mississippi, and Tennessee; b. Unjust enrichment claims in the following jurisdictions with a statute of limitations three years or shorter: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington; c. Unjust enrichment claims in the following jurisdictions with a direct benefit pleading requirement: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island; d. Unjust enrichment claims in the following jurisdictions that are precluded by state law restrictions, including restrictions on indirect purchaser antitrust suits: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming; e. Unjust enrichment claims in the following jurisdictions that are duplicative of otherwise pled state statutory claims: Arizona, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin; f. Statutory antitrust claim brought in Illinois, where only the Attorney General may bring a class-action lawsuit on behalf of indirect purchasers, 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 10/7(2). g. Statutory consumer protection claims brought in Massachusetts, which prohibits entities engaged in ''trade or commerce" are prohibited from pursuing indirect purchaser suits, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A 9, 11; and h. Statutory consumer protection claims brought in Missouri, which allows only claims based on purchases made "primarily for personal, family, or household purposes," Mo. Rev. Stat. 407.025(1). Accordingly, DPPs' Section 1 (applying the rule of reason) and Section 2 Sherman Act claims remain. In addition, remaining in the action are end payor plaintiffs' statutory antitrust claims arising under the laws of Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Also remaining is EPPs' Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Fla. Stat. 501.204, claim. The clerk shall terminate the following motions: 18-cv-4361, ECF 118; 18-cv-5536, ECF 36, 51; 18-cv-5603, ECF 46, 59; 18-cv-5708, ECF 33, 46; 18-cv-5886, ECF 48, 61; 18-cv-9861, ECF 17, 18. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 8/14/19) (yv)
|
|
Filing 36
ORDER ON DISCOVERY: A theory of damages that extending years after generic entry may ultimately prove insufficiently reliable. Nevertheless, in light of some potential price reduction beyond that threshold and an absence of undue burden of production, plaintiffs may consider the additional sales data in developing their theory. Accordingly, defendants shall produce branded and generic Exforge sales data through 2017. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/18/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-04361-AKH et al.(anc)
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER ON DISCOVERY. Accordingly, Novartis shall produce documents concerning revenues, quantities sold, prices charged per unit, profits, direct expenses, per year amortization of development costs, and useful life of AGs launched between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2015. Novartis shall also produce documents related to business plans, pricing plans, financial projections, and consolidating work papers for AGs launched during the same period. With respect to Request No. 13, the relatively narrow scope of the inquiry justifies larger timeframe. Novartis shall conduct a reasonable inquiry and produce to plaintiffs a list of branded products sold by Novartis, for which AG versions were launched between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015, and the dates of the AG launches. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/6/2019) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL. Plaintiffs move for an order compelling non- party Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Mylan") to produce various documents. Mylan's May 24, 2019 production of 35,000 documents, identified in its May 31, 2019 memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion, is sufficient. Further custodial searches and additional manufacturing discovery are disproportional, unduly burdensome, and, thus, unwarranted at this juncture. To the extent that plaintiffs seek to compel further production, their motion is denied. Plaintiffs have leave to renew their motion upon a further showing that this production is insufficient. The clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (ECF 156). So ordered. Denying (156) Motion to Compel in case 1:18-cv-04361-AKH. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 6/6/2019) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 33
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED THAT: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss shall constitute a response to the Amended Complaint on behalf of Novartis AG, and all briefing on the Motions to Dismiss (which are fully briefed) will apply with equal force to the claims made in the Amended Complaint, without any further briefing. Novartis AG shall be subject to and bound by the Court's decisions on the pending Motions to Dismiss with respect to the Amended Complaint. All Requests for the Production of Documents previously served on Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation by Plaintiffs shall be deemed served on Novartis AG by Plaintiffs. Novartis Defendants' Responses and Objections to the Requests for Production of Documents, served on October 25, 2018, shall be deemed to have been served on Plaintiffs by Novartis AG. All Interrogatories previously served on Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation by Plaintiffs shall be deemed served on Novartis AG by Plaintiffs. Novartis Defendants' Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, served on February 28, 2019, shall be deemed to have been served on Plaintiffs by Novartis AG. Except as expressly modified herein or in any previous or subsequent Order, the Court's August 3, 2018 Order (Case No. 1:18-cv-04361-AKH, ECF No. 59) remains in effect. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 5/28/2019) (ne)
|
|
Filing 32
PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Novartis AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (North, Julie)
|
|
Filing 31
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Novartis AG. (jgo)
|
|
Filing 30
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Novartis AG, re: #29 Amended Complaint,. Document filed by H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Perwin, Scott)
|
|
Filing 29
AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint, against Novartis AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO, H-E-B L.P.. Related document: #1 Complaint,.(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Scott Eliot Perwin to RE-FILE Document No. #28 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The summons requested was not processed due to the deficient pleading. Please file your request for summons when you correct and refile your pleading.;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc)
|
|
Filing 28
FILING ERROR SUMMONS NOT LINKED TO CORRESPONDING PLEADING- REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NOVARTIS AG, re: #26 Amended Complaint,. Document filed by H-E-B LLP, The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Perwin, Scott) Modified on 4/2/2019 (pc).
|
|
Filing 27
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED COMPLAINT: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED THAT: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Defendants consent to the filing of the Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit 1 ("Amended Complaint"). This consent shall in no way be deemed an admission of any allegations in the Amended Complaint or of the sufficiency of the Amended Complaint to state a claim, in whole or in part. HEB shall be deemed a party to and bound by the Joint Stipulation and Order for Pretrial Coordination. HEB shall be deemed included in the definition of "Retailer Plaintiffs" in the Joint Stipulation and Order for Pretrial Coordination. (As further set forth in this stipulation) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 1/29/2019) (ne)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Scott Eliot Perwin to RE-FILE re: Document No. #26 Amended Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF; party name 'H-E-B, LLP' does not match party name on pleading caption; you must add 'H-E-B, L.P' to CM ECF; due to the incorrect party name, the wrong filer/filers were selected for the pleading. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents.. Re-file the pleading using the event type Amended Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pne)
|
|
Filing 26
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILER ERROR - AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint, against Novartis AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO, H-E-B LLP. Related document: #1 Complaint,.(Perwin, Scott) Modified on 1/30/2019 (pne).
|
|
Filing 25
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL COORDINATION: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED THAT: The Rite Aid Action is hereby coordinated with the Coordinated Actions for purposes of discovery and pretrial proceedings to the extent practicable, and the files of such actions shall be maintained in one file under Docket No. 18-cv-04361. The Complaint in the Rite Aid Action shall be deemed served on Defendants as of the date of entry of this Order. The Rite Aid Action is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice as against ONLY Novartis Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Endo International plc, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (As further set forth in this stipulation) Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis Corporation, Endo International PLC and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 1/25/2019) (ne)
|
|
Filing 24
BRIEF ("Defendants' Reply to Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss and Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss"). Document filed by Novartis AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc.(North, Julie)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #20 Motion for Lauren Carol Ravkind to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/14/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #21 Motion for Anna Theresa Neill to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/14/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION for Anna Theresa Neill to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15899430. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Anna Neill Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Anna Neill Certificate of Good Standing)(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #20 MOTION for Lauren Carol Ravkind to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #20 MOTION for Lauren Carol Ravkind to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #21 MOTION for Anna Theresa Neill to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15899430. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Lauren Carol Ravkind to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
Filing 19
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). . Document filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc. (North, Julie)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). Document filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc.(North, Julie)
|
|
Filing 17
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY (SEE #18 Motion) - MOTION to Dismiss ("Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief"). Document filed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.'s and the Kroger Co.'s Claims for Injunctive Relief)(North, Julie) Modified on 11/13/2018 (db).
|
|
Filing 16
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Lauren Carol Ravkind to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15892260. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Perwin, Scott) Modified on 11/9/2018 (jc).
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #16 MOTION for Lauren Carol Ravkind to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15892260. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): attorney seeking admission cannot electronically sign documents using another attorney's e-filing credentials - original signatures needed OR attorney needs to apply for their own e-filing credentials. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Attorney Affidavit/Declaration - attach Proposed Order. (jc)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #6 Motion for Scott E. Perwin to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/7/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 14
MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #11 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. ENDORSEMENT: So ordered. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/6/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 13
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL COORDINATION: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED THAT: 1. The Retailer Plaintiff Action is hereby coordinated with the Coordinated Actions for purposes of discovery and pretrial proceedings to the extent practicable, and the files of such actions shall be maintained in one file under Docket No. 18-cv-04361. 8. The Retailer Plaintiff Action is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice as against ONLY Novartis Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Endo International plc, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). So Ordered. (As further set forth in this stipulation) Novartis Corporation, Endo International PLC and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 11/5/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER ADMITTING COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE granting (107) Motion for Thomas W. Ryan to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 1:18-cv-04361-AKH. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 10/31/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-04361-AKH et al (ne)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss . Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Brief)(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court wishes to have a better understanding of the pending cases, the pending motion to dismiss (ECF 85), and whether it would be appropriate to appoint a lead counsel. Accordingly, a status conference will be held on November 8, 2018, at 2:30 p.m. (Status Conference set for 11/8/2018 at 02:30 PM before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein.) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 10/29/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting (92) Motion for David Francis Sorensen to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 1:18-cv-04361-AKH. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 10/29/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-04361-AKH et al. (ne)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting (96) Motion for John Gerard Albanese to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 1:18-cv-04361-AKH. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 10/29/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-04361-AKH et al. (ne) (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 10/29/2018) (ne)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting (93) Motion for Caitlin G. Coslett to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 1:18-cv-04361-AKH. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 10/29/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-04361-AKH et al. (ne) Modified on 10/30/2018 (ne).
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb)
|
|
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:18-cv-04361-AKH. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Scott E. Perwin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15815203. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Perwin, Scott)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Scott Eliot Perwin. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Scott Eliot Perwin to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Citizenship Plaintiff and Citizenship Defendant codes must only be selected when Diversity Jurisdiction code is selected;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated June 2017. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated June 2017 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (jgo)
|
|
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein as possibly related to 18-cv-4361. (jgo)
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #6 MOTION for Scott E. Perwin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-15815203. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
|
|
Filing 4
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Scott E. Perwin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Perwin, Scott) Modified on 10/25/2018 (jc).
|
|
Filing 3
STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:18-cv-04361. Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO.(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Perwin, Scott) Modified on 10/26/2018 (jgo).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Endo International PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical Inc. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15809326)Document filed by The Kroger Co., Walgreen CO.(Perwin, Scott)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Fee Due: for #4 MOTION for Scott E. Perwin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. (jc)
|
|
>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE re: Document No. #4 MOTION for Scott E. Perwin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): 1) missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Florida (our court does not accept state bar certificates for Florida); 2) missing Proposed Order; and 3) the $200 filing fee was not paid. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Attorney Affidavit/Declaration - attach Proposed Order. Pay the filing fee using the event Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment found under the event list Other Documents. (jc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
