Rappa v. Hibachi Grill and Supreme Buffet Inc. et al
| Ms. Natassja Rappa and Natassja Rappa |
| Jackson Chen and Hibachi Grill and Supreme Buffet Inc. |
| 1:2018cv10050 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ed |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint served on Hibachi Grill and Supreme Buffet Inc. on 11/15/2018. Service was accepted by Nancy Doughterty Secretary of State. Document filed by Natassja Rappa. (Nadler, Seth) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hibachi Grill and Supreme Buffet Inc.. (dnh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Hibachi Grill & Supreme Buffet Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Natassja Rappa. (Nadler, Seth) |
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Seth Asher Nadler to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): 'As to' Error; the party name listed as to whom the summons is being issued must exactly match the party of record. Attorney information was omitted. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Seth Asher Nadler. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Bronx. (dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Seth Asher Nadler. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Seth Asher Nadler. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (dnh) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST As To - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Hibachi Grill & Supreme Buffet, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Natassja Rappa. (Nadler, Seth) Modified on 11/1/2018 (dnh). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Nadler, Seth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jackson Chen, Hibachi Grill and Supreme Buffet Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15838630)Document filed by Natassja Rappa.(Nadler, Seth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
