Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP v. Manhattan River Group, LLC et al
Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP |
Jerald Tenenbaum, Manhattan River Group, LLC and Josh Rosen |
1:2018cv10283 |
November 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Labor: Fair Standards |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference and the Court's Individual Rules served on Defendants on December 10, 2018. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP. (Schulman, Denise) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Josh Rosen served on 12/3/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. Service was accepted by Stefan D. (co-worker). Document filed by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Jerald Tenenbaum served on 12/3/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. Service was accepted by Stefan D. (co-worker). Document filed by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Manhattan River Group, LLC served on 12/3/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. Service was accepted by Stefan D.. Document filed by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 1/30/2019 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/26/2018) (rro) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Denise Andrea Schulman on behalf of Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP. (Schulman, Denise) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Manhattan River Group, LLC, Josh Rosen, Jerald Tenenbaum. (pne) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 15:2(a). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 29:216(b). (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Manhattan River Group,LLC, Jerald Tenenbaum, and Josh Rosen, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Manhattan River Group, LLC, Josh Rosen, Jerald Tenenbaum. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15870100)Document filed by Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP.(Kirschenbaum, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.