James v. United States of America
| Kent Adam James |
| United States of America |
| 1:2018cv10389 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Loretta A Preska |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File. ENDORSEMENT: Petitioner's time to file an Amended Petition is extended to January 8, 2019. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 12/10/2018) (jwh) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2019. (jwh) |
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED 28:2255 MOTION AS PER THIS COURT'S 11/8/18 "ORDER TO ANSWER" IN THE MATTER OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED SUCCESSIVE 2255 PETITION. Document filed by Kent Adam James.(sc) |
Filing 4
HABEAS INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Kent Adam James ID No. 92530-071 FCI - Hazelton P.O. Box 5000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525, at, on 11/8/2018 Re: #3 Order to Answer. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (nb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255: The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new civil action, James v. United States, with a new case number. The Clerk of Court is further directed to docket in the new case the following documents from Case No. 00-CV-8818 (LAP): ECF Nos. #8 ( 2255 motion), and #12 (memorandum of law). Within thirty days of the date of this order, Movant may file an amended 2255 motion or, in the alternative, submit a letter stating that he wishes to rely on what he has already filed (the motion and memorandum of law). Within thirty days of the date of Movant's submission, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the motion. Movant shall have thirty days from the date on which Movant is served with Respondent's answer to file a response. Absent further order, the motion will be considered fully submitted as of that date. All further papers filed or submitted for filing must include the criminal docket number and will be docketed in the criminal case. Movant's applications for counsel and for discovery, filed in 00-CV-8818, are denied without prejudice to renewal at a later date after the Court has had more of the relevant facts and legal issues presented to it for its consideration. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate those motions. (ECF Nos. 9, 11.) The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this order has been issued. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to Movant at: Kent Adam James, #92530-071, FCI Hazelton, P.O. Box 5000, Bruceton Mills, W. Va. 26525, and note service on the docket. Responses due by 1/7/2019. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/7/2018) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Document filed by Kent Adam James. (sac) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 1:97-cr-00185-LAP-2. Document filed by Kent Adam James. (sac) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:97-cr-00185-LAP. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sac) |
| Mailed a copy of Docket Sheet, #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), #2 Memorandum of Law in Support, #3 Order to Answer, to Kent Adam James ID No. 92530-071 FCI - Hazelton P.O. Box 5000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525. (vba) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Jane Ravener |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kent Adam James | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
