Figueroa v. Jacques Torres Retail, LLC
| Jose Figueroa |
| Jacques Torres Retail, LLC |
| 1:2018cv10669 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 2/21/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla and further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/18/2018) (rro)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Jacques Torres Retail, LLC answer due 1/31/2019.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/14/2018) (rro)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Martin B. Adams, Esq. dated December 13, 2018. Document filed by Jacques Torres Retail, LLC.(Adams, Martin) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jacques Torres Retail, LLC. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jacques Torres Retail, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jose Figueroa. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jacques Torres Retail, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15919747)Document filed by Jose Figueroa.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Figueroa v. Jacques Torres Retail, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jacques Torres Retail, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Martin Bernard Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose Figueroa | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
