Valerio v. New York City Department of Correction et al
| Milton A. Valero and Milton A. Valerio |
| New York City Department of Correction and Doctor Herbert Kwasnik |
| 1:2018cv11130 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE MAILED to Milton A. Valerio, at 124 Fort George Avenue Apt. 10D New York, NY 10040, on 1/11/2019 Re: #5 Order of Service via REGULAR MAIL. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, a copy of the Mediation Referral Order for Pro Se Employment Discrimination Cases, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases). (bwa)
|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Herbert Kwasnik, New York City Department of Correction. (bwa) |
| FRCP 4 SERVICE PACKAGE HAND DELIVERED TO U.S.M.: on 1/11/2019 Re: Judge J. Paul Oetken #5 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: Summons, IFP, Order of Service, Completed U.S.M. form(s) for defendant(s)New York City Department of Correction, Dr. Herbert Kwasnik. (bwa) |
|
Filing 6
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR PRO SE EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES: IT IS ORDERED that this pro se case is referred for mediation to the Court's Mediation Program. Local Civil Rule 83.9 and the Mediation Program Procedures shall govern the mediation. Unless otherwise ordered, the mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling order issued by this Court, and all parties are obligated to continue to litigate the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall attempt to locate pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff at the mediation. Pro bono counsel will contact Plaintiff directly. The time to assign a mediator under Local Civil Rule 83.9 and the Court's Mediation Program Procedures will be deferred until pro bono counsel has filed a Notice of Limited Appearance of Pro Bono Counsel. Pro bono counsel will represent Plaintiff solely for purposes of the mediation, and that representation will terminate at the conclusion of the mediation process. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any objection by Plaintiff either to the mediation or to the Court's request for pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff in the mediation must be filed within 14 days of this order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/10/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rro)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF SERVICE: Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants the New York City Department of Correction and Dr. Herbert Kwasnik through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form ("USM-285 form") for each of these defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all of the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon these defendants. Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. SO ORDERED. USM-285 Form due by 2/11/2019. Request for Issuance of Summons due by 2/11/2019. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/10/2019) (ama)
|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application, to Milton A. Valerio 124 Fort George Avenue Apt. 10D New York, NY 10040. (aea) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (ma) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (ma) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 1/8/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/8/2019) (asg).
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Herbert Kwasnik, New York City Department of Correction. Document filed by Milton A. Valerio.(sac) Modified on 1/8/2019 (sac). |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Milton A. Valerio.(sac) Modified on 1/8/2019 (sac). |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
