Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Gallarreta et al
| Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. |
| John Does 1-10 and Jose Gallarreta |
| 1:2018cv11138 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/7/2019 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/30/2018) (ne)
|
| Filing 9 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (sj) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jose Gallarreta. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney John Macaluso. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Adam Wallace Sgro on behalf of Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Sgro, Adam) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian William Brokate on behalf of Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Brokate, Brian) |
| Filing 5 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review.(Macaluso, John) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jose Gallarreta individually and d/b/a www.rolextracker.com, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Macaluso, John) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Rolex Industries, Inc. for Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. Document filed by Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc..(Macaluso, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Macaluso, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jose Gallarreta, John Does 1-10. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-15980038)Document filed by Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Macaluso, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
