El Bey v. Thompson et al
| Josephine El Bey |
| Attorney Glenn Hardy, Judge Judy Kim, Officer Alleva, Judge Ann Thompson, Detective Morales, Officer Bencea, Ariel Schneller, Marva A. Burnett, Esq. and Judge Sandra Roper |
| 1:2018cv11162 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #5 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening), Add and Terminate Parties, to Josephine El Bey c/o 341 West 24th St. Unit 2F New York, NY 10011. (aea) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO AMEND: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The following Defendants are dismissed from the action: Judge Ann Thompson; Judge Judy Kim; Judge Sandra Roper; Marva A. Burnett, Esq., Court Attorney Referee; Attorney Glenn Hardy; Attorney Ariel Schneller; and "All District Attorneys Associated With This Case (Names Unknown At The Present)." The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate their names from the docket. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 18-CV-11162 (LLS). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and she cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Judy Kim, Sandra Roper, Ariel Schneller, Ann Thompson, Marva A. Burnett, Esq (Court Attorney Referee) and Glenn Hardy terminated. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 12/21/2018) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 12/10/2018) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application to Josephine El Bey c/o 341 West 24th St. Unit 2F New York, NY 10011. (aea) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Josephine El Bey consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Josephine El Bey.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Alleva, Bencea, Marva A. Burnett, Esq, Glenn Hardy, Judy Kim, Morales, Sandra Roper, Ariel Schneller, Ann Thompson. Document filed by Josephine El Bey.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Josephine El Bey.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
