Onatolu v. The People of the State of New York
| Adekunle A. Onatolu |
| The People of the State of New York |
| 1:2018cv11298 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order of Dismissal, #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), to Adekunle A. Onatolu 217 S. 12th Avenue Mount Vernon, NY 10550 with Right to Appeal Forms attached. (aea) Modified on 12/11/2018 (aea). |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the order issued December 7, 2018, dismissing the complaint, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the July 9, 2015 order in Onatolu v. U.S. Army, No. 15-CV-2829 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2015), the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 12/7/2018) (jwh) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651: On July 9, 2015, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Onatolu v. U.S. Army, No. 15-CV-2829 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2015). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the July 9, 2015 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 12/7/2018) (jwh) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (jwh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against The People of the State of New York. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu. (sac) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu.(sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Onatolu v. The People of the State of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adekunle A. Onatolu | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The People of the State of New York | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
