Worthington et al v. Jetsmarter, Inc. et al
Massimo Tassan-Solet, Jennifer Worthington and Alexandra Worthington |
Jetsmarter, Inc., David Sheridan, Corrections Officers John Does 1-4 and John Does 1-4 |
1:2018cv12113 |
December 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Catherine Bentivegna on behalf of Jetsmarter, Inc., David Sheridan. (Bentivegna, Catherine) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Jason Dimuro on behalf of Jetsmarter, Inc., David Sheridan. (Dimuro, Daniel) |
Filing 13 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #12 Letter filed by Jennifer Worthington, Massimo Tassan-Solet, Alexandra Worthington. ENDORSEMENT: The request for a motion is GRANTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss and compel arbitration shall be due by March 1, 2019; Plaintiffs' response shall be due by March 29, 2019; Defendants' reply shall be due by April 12, 2019. The initial pretrial conference set for March 13, 2019, is adjourned sine die. (Motions due by 3/1/2019., Responses due by 3/29/2019, Replies due by 4/12/2019.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/1/2019) (rro) |
Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Bruce E. Baldinger dated January 31, 2019 re: Response to Pre-Motion Letter. Document filed by Massimo Tassan-Solet, Jennifer Worthington, Alexandra Worthington.(Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File pre-answer motion seeking dismissal of Complaint and to compel binding arbitration addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Ronald A. Giller dated January 28, 2019. Document filed by Jetsmarter, Inc., David Sheridan.(Giller, Ronald) |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. David Sheridan served on 1/7/2019, answer due 1/28/2019. Service was accepted by Mandi Sanders, Corporate Operations Manager. Document filed by Jennifer Worthington; Massimo Tassan-Solet; Alexandra Worthington. (Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Jetsmarter, Inc. served on 1/7/2019, answer due 1/28/2019. Service was accepted by Mandi Sanders, Corporate Operations Manager. Document filed by Jennifer Worthington; Massimo Tassan-Solet; Alexandra Worthington. (Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/13/2019 at 12:30 PM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/11/2019) (jca) |
Filing 7 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-4, Jetsmarter, Inc., David Sheridan. Document filed by Jennifer Worthington, Massimo Tassan-Solet, Alexandra Worthington.(Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to David Sheridan. (vf) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jetsmarter, Inc. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Bruce E. Baldinger to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Bruce E. Baldinger. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand 2,312,868,000; County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 2,313,000; the County code has been modified to New York. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to David Sheridan, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Massimo Tassan-Solet, Jennifer Worthington, Alexandra Worthington. (Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jetsmarter, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Massimo Tassan-Solet, Jennifer Worthington, Alexandra Worthington. (Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Baldinger, Bruce) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR -COMPLAINT against Jennifer Worthington, Massimo Tassan-Solet, Alexandra Worthington. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16097076)Document filed by Jennifer Worthington, Massimo Tassan-Solet, Alexandra Worthington.(Baldinger, Bruce) Modified on 12/26/2018 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.