Diaz v. Sotheby's, Inc.
| Edwin Diaz |
| Sotheby's and Sotheby's, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv12391 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE... It is hereby: ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal for the Court to So Order. Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the active calendar of this Court in the event that the settlement is not consummated. Upon such application for reinstatement, the parties shall continue to be subject to the Court's jurisdiction, the Court shall promptly reinstate the action to its active docket, and the parties shall be directed to appear before the Court, without the necessity of additional process, on a date within ten (10) days of the application, to schedule remaining pretrial proceedings and/or dispositive motions, as appropriate. This Order shall be deemed a final discontinuance of the action with prejudice in the event that Plaintiff has not requested restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/15/19) (yv)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 3/20/2019 at 12:30 PM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/24/2019) (rro) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 Complaint. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Sotheby's, Inc. answer due 3/14/2019.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/11/2019) (rro)
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #4 Complaint addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Shira M. Blank dated January 11, 2019. Document filed by Sotheby's, Inc..(Blank, Shira) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shira M. Blank on behalf of Sotheby's, Inc.. (Blank, Shira) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Adam Stein on behalf of Sotheby's, Inc.. (Stein, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Maxine Arielle Adams on behalf of Sotheby's, Inc.. (Adams, Maxine) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Sotheby's, Inc. served on 1/7/2019, answer due 1/28/2019. Service was accepted by LEGAL REP. OF CSC. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sotheby's, Inc.. (sj) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sotheby's, Inc., re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Sotheby's, Inc.. Document filed by Edwin Diaz.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joseph H Mizrahi. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Sotheby's, Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joseph H Mizrahi to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected; party name has been modified to correspond with pleading. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sotheby's, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Edwin Diaz. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR COMPLAINT against Sotheby's. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16121077)Document filed by Edwin Diaz.(Mizrahi, Joseph) Modified on 1/2/2019 (sj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
