Wright v. Fields Jr.
| Ronald Wright |
| Supt. Leroy Fields Jr. |
| 1:2018cv12410 |
| December 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Eastern District of New York acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:19-cv-00576, filed on 01/30/2019. (sjo) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York (rj) |
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order, to Ronald Wright Fishkill Correctional Facility P.O. Box 1245 Beacon, NY 12508. (aea) |
Filing 3
TRANSFER ORDER: Accordingly, this action is transferred under Local Civil Rule 83.3 to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and to close this case. At this time, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and thus a certificate of appealability will not issue under 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444--45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a non frivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/11/2019) (rj) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Modified on 1/14/2019 (rj).
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number 465401225728)Document filed by Ronald Wright.(pc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/4/2019: #1 Envelope) (pc). |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. Fields Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ronald Wright | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Supt. Leroy Fields Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
