Madigan v. Bronstein et al
| Faye Madigan |
| Aron O. Bronstein, Tomer M. Yuzary, Iosif Pak and Roman Sakharovich |
| 1:2018mc00061 |
| February 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| William H. Pauley |
| Other |
| M 08-85 Motion to Compel |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
OPINION & ORDER re: 5 MOTION to Compel New York State Supreme Court to Produce records . filed by Faye Madigan, 7 MOTION to Compel Faina Bronstein to appear deposition . filed by Faye Madigan. Accordingly, Madiga n's motions are denied. Any further application by Madigan in federal court for discovery in aid of the state judgment lien shall attach a copy of this Opinion & Order. Madigan is further directed to serve a copy of this Opinion & Order on the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and file an affidavit of service on the docket. Madigan is directed to file no further applications without opening a new miscellaneous action and paying the filing fee. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 5 and 7 and mark this miscellaneous case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 4/12/2018) (kgo) (Main Document 9 replaced on 4/12/2018) (kgo).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
