Cronin v. The Long Island Railroad Company
| Thomas Cronin |
| The Long Island Railroad Company |
| 1:2019cv00464 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Alison J Nathan |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint served. The Long Island Railroad Company served on 3/4/2019, answer due 3/25/2019. Service was accepted by Vivian Oliver-Taylor. Document filed by Thomas Cronin. (Gold, Fredric) |
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on Friday, May 17, 2019 at 3:15 pm in Courtroom 906 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. Initial Conference set for 5/17/2019 at 03:15 PM in Courtroom 906, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/22/2019) (kv)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The Long Island Railroad Company. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Long Island Railroad Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Thomas Cronin. (Gold, Fredric) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Gold, Fredric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Long Island Railroad Company. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16200430)Document filed by Thomas Cronin.(Gold, Fredric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cronin v. The Long Island Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Long Island Railroad Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Cronin | |
| Represented By: | Fredric M. Gold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
