Dawson v. Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc.
Deshawn Dawson |
Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc. |
1:2019cv00527 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE: By letter dated February 21, 2019, the parties reported to the Court that they have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal for the Court to So Order. Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the active calendar of this Court in the event that the settlement is not consummated. Upon such application for reinstatement, the parties shall continue to be subject to the Court's jurisdiction, the Court shall promptly reinstate the action to its active docket, and the parties shall be directed to appear before the Court, without the necessity of additional process, on a date within ten (10) days of the application, to schedule remaining pretrial proceedings and/or dispositive motions, as appropriate. This Order shall be deemed a final discontinuance of the action with prejudice in the event that Plaintiff has not requested restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/22/2019) (rro) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Deshawn Dawson. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc. answer due 3/15/2019 (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/11/2019) (kv) |
Filing 8 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Joseph J. DiPalma dated 2/11/19. Document filed by Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc..(DiPalma, Joseph) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James DiPalma on behalf of Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc.. (DiPalma, Joseph) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on March 28, 2019, at 10:30 a.m., in Courtroom 618 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, as further set forth in this Order. Initial Conference set for 3/28/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/30/2019) (kv). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc. served on 1/25/2019, answer due 2/15/2019. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, Agent. Document filed by Deshawn Dawson. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc.. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Deshawn Dawson. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16208690)Document filed by Deshawn Dawson.(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dawson v. Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mark Borghi Fine Art Inc. | |
Represented By: | Joseph James DiPalma |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deshawn Dawson | |
Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.