Conner v. AdoreMe, Inc.
| Mary Conner |
| AdoreMe, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01170 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for the parties hereto that Defendant AdoreMe, Inc. shall have up to and including April 15, 2019 to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. So Ordered. (AdoreMe, Inc. answer due 4/15/2019.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/20/19) (yv)
|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by AdoreMe, Inc.. (Shapiro, Peter) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Zucco on behalf of AdoreMe, Inc.. (Zucco, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Peter T. Shapiro on behalf of AdoreMe, Inc.. (Shapiro, Peter) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John G. Koeltl: Initial Conference set for 5/6/2019 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 14A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge John G. Koeltl. (Fletcher, Donnie) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to AdoreMe, Inc.. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to AdoreMe, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Mary Conner. (Shaked, Dan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Shaked, Dan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AdoreMe, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16309605)Document filed by Mary Conner.(Shaked, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conner v. AdoreMe, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Conner | |
| Represented By: | Dan Shaked |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AdoreMe, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter T. Shapiro |
| Represented By: | Sarah Zucco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
