Morrison v. Snack Innovations Inc.
| Aurora Morrison |
| Snack Innovations Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01238 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| William H Pauley |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Snack Innovations Inc. served on 3/18/2019, answer due 4/8/2019. Service was accepted by Amy Lesch (Secretary of State). Document filed by Aurora Morrison. (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne Melissa Seelig on behalf of Aurora Morrison. (Seelig, Anne) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Michael Brown on behalf of Aurora Morrison. (Brown, William) |
Filing 5
ORDER FOR INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 4/18/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 20B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge William H. Pauley III, as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 2/12/2019) (jwh)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Snack Innovations Inc.. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge William H. Pauley, III. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Snack Innovations Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Aurora Morrison. (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Snack Innovations Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16319585)Document filed by Aurora Morrison. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lee, C.K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morrison v. Snack Innovations Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Snack Innovations Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aurora Morrison | |
| Represented By: | C.K. Lee |
| Represented By: | William Michael Brown |
| Represented By: | Anne Melissa Seelig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
