Polidora v. Dagostino & Associates
| James J. Polidora |
| Dagostino & Associates |
| 7:2019cv01290 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Received returned mail re: #3 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening). Mail was addressed to James J. Polidora, 255 Franklin Avenue, Belleville, NJ 07109 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return to Sender Insuffient Address Unable to Forward Return to Sender. (vn)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #3 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening), to James Polidora c/o Christopher Errante, Esq. 518 Stuyvesant Avenue Lyndhurst, NY 07017. (aea)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #3 Order 60 Days Amended Complaint (case opening), to James J. Polidora 255 Franklin Avenue Belleville, NJ 07109. (aea)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO AMEND: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set forth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 19-CV-1290 (CM). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and he cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 2/25/2019) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Louis L. Stanton. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (dnh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Dagostino & Associates. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465407016779)Document filed by James J. Polidora.(dnh)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Dagostino & Associates. (dnh)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Polidora v. Dagostino & Associates | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James J. Polidora | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dagostino & Associates | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
