Perera Kuranage v. Whittaker et al
| Sriyantha Gregory Perera Kuranage |
| DISTRICT DIRECTOR THOMAS CIOPPA, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, Matthew Whittaker, Thomas Cioppa and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 1:2019cv01612 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Simon Nakajima on behalf of Thomas Cioppa, Kirstjen Nielsen, Matthew Whittaker. (Nakajima, Simon) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Thomas Cioppa, Kirstjen Nielsen, Matthew Whittaker. (pne) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Matthew Whittaker, Kirstjen Nielsen, Thomas Cioppa, re: #3 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, #4 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Sriyantha Gregory Perera Kuranage. (Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran to RE-FILE Document No. #8 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF case caption does not exactly match initial pleading caption; party name on the PDF 'To' section does not exactly match initial pleading caption;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Matthew Whittaker; Kirstjen Nielsen; Thomas Cioppa, re: #1 Complaint, #3 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus, #4 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Sriyantha Gregory Perera Kuranage. (Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) Modified on 3/29/2019 (jgo). |
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) |
Filing 6
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by April 30, 2019, bring or deliver by mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at http://nysd.uscomis.gov/file/forms/consent-toproceed-before-us-magistrate-judge and attached to this order, to Orders & Judgments, Room 210, Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, 10007. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by April 30, 2019, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/5/19) (yv)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Initial Conference set for 5/7/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 15D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Analisa Torres. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/5/2019) (ne)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): due to party modification, the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the form used for the civil cover sheet is not the S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet form dated June 2017; the PDF case caption does not exactly match initial pleading caption. If all of the names do not fit, use leading party name followed by 'et al'; Jury Demand code - no selection;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated June 2017. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated June 2017 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Matthew Whittaker; Kirstjen Nielsen; Thomas Cioppa. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Richmond;. (jgo) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against THOMAS CIOPPA, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, Matthew Whittaker.Document filed by Sriyantha Gregory Perera Kuranage. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - C)(Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) Modified on 3/5/2019 (jgo). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct. the PDF caption must be titled 'Plaintiff' v. 'Defendants';. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 3/5/2019. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against THOMAS CIOPPA, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, Matthew Whittaker.Document filed by Sriyantha Gregory Perera Kuranage. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - C)(Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) Modified on 2/28/2019 (jgo). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the pleading;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 2/27/2019. (jgo) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) Modified on 3/5/2019 (jgo). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - COMPLAINT against THOMAS CIOPPA, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, Matthew Whittaker. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16380091)Document filed by Sriyantha Gregory Perera Kuranage. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - C)(Rudrakumaran, Visuvanathan) Modified on 2/22/2019 (jgo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
