Skatteforvaltningen v. Cavus Systems LLC Roth 401(K) Plan et al
Skatteforvaltningen |
Cavus Systems LLC Roth 401(K) Plan, Richard Markowitz and Michael Ben-Jacob |
1:2019cv01869 |
February 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Lewis A Kaplan |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William R. Maguire on behalf of Skatteforvaltningen. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(Maguire, William) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Loomis Cave on behalf of Skatteforvaltningen. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Neil John Oxford on behalf of Skatteforvaltningen. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(Oxford, Neil) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marc Alan Weinstein on behalf of Skatteforvaltningen. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(Weinstein, Marc) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Thomas McGoey on behalf of Skatteforvaltningen. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(McGoey, John) |
Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan from Sarah L. Cave dated April 4, 2019 re: Waivers of service and case schedule. Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Waivers of Service. Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(Cave, Sarah) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (wb) |
CONSOLIDATED MDL CASE: Create association to 1:18-md-02865-LAK. (sjo) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:18-md-02865-LAK. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Richard Markowitz. (pne) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael Ben-Jacob. (pne) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cavus Systems LLC Roth 401(K) Plan. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (pne) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Lewis A. Kaplan as possibly related to 18MD2865. (pne) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Michael Ben-Jacob, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen. (Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Richard Markowitz, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen. (Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Cavus Systems LLC Roth 401(K) Plan, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen. (Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 18-md-2865. Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen.(Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Cave, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Ben-Jacob, Cavus Systems LLC Roth 401(K) Plan, Richard Markowitz. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16416254)Document filed by Skatteforvaltningen.(Cave, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.