Onatolu v. SPOA Application
| Adekunle A. Onatolu |
| SPOA Application |
| 1:2019cv02165 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #7 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint),, #6 Order of Dismissal, Notice of Appeal Forms to Adekunle A. Onatolu 217 S. 12th Avenue Mount Vernon, NY 10550. (vba) |
Filing 7
CIVIL JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that under the July 9, 2015 order in Onatolu v. U.S. Army, No. 15-CV-2829 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2015), the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/14/2019) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1651. Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the July 9, 2015 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate all other pending matters. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/14/2019) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (rjm) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Notice of Appeal. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu.(rdz) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu.(rdz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for 90,000,000 Dollars place or housing. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SPOA Application. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Adekunle A. Onatolu.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Onatolu v. SPOA Application | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adekunle A. Onatolu | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SPOA Application | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
