Ramirez v. Superior One Management Corp. et al
Arturo Ramirez |
374 Superior Apartment LLC, 1756 MK Realty Group LLC, Superior Apartments, LLC, 1905 MK Realty Group LLC, 1757 MK Realty Group LLC, 3336 MK Realty Group LLC, 1242 Superior Apartment I LLC, 1201 MK Realty Group LLC, 9037 MK Realty Group LLC, Superior One Management Corp., 609 MK Realty Group LLC, Abdul Khan, 711 MK Realty Group LLC, 2720 Superior Apartment LLC, 685 MK Realty Group LLC, 9039 MK Realty Group LLC, 213 MK Realty Group LLC, MK Realty Group, LLC and 2250 Superior Apartment LLC |
1:2019cv02287 |
March 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Rapaport, Marc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1201 MK Realty Group LLC, 1242 Superior Apartment I LLC, 1756 MK Realty Group LLC, 1757 MK Realty Group LLC, 1905 MK Realty Group LLC, 213 MK Realty Group LLC, 2250 Superior Apartment LLC, 2720 Superior Apartment LLC, 3336 MK Realty Group LLC, 374 Superior Apartment LLC, 609 MK Realty Group LLC, 685 MK Realty Group LLC, 711 MK Realty Group LLC, 9037 MK Realty Group LLC, 9039 MK Realty Group LLC, Abdul Khan, MK Realty Group, LLC, Superior Apartments, LLC, Superior One Management Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16490789)Document filed by Arturo Ramirez.(Rapaport, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.