GateGuard, Inc. v. MVI Systems LLC et al
GateGuard, Inc. |
Samuel Taub and MVI Systems LLC |
1:2019cv02472 |
March 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Reinitz, Ariel) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Samuel Taub, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by GateGuard, Inc.. (Reinitz, Ariel) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MVI Systems LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by GateGuard, Inc.. (Reinitz, Ariel) |
Filing 2 FIRST MOTION for Ariel Saul Reinitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-16528170. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by GateGuard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Appendix)(Reinitz, Ariel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MVI Systems LLC, Samuel Taub. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16527984)Document filed by GateGuard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reinitz, Ariel) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2 FIRST MOTION for Ariel Saul Reinitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-16528170. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.