Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund |
Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Designated Activity Company, Merrill Lynch International, NatWest Markets plc, John Does 1-50 and Bank of America, N.A. |
1:2019cv02601 |
March 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bank of America, N.A.; Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Designated Activity Company (f/k/a Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited); Merrill Lynch International; NatWest Markets plc (f/k/a The Royal Bank of Scotland plc); NatWest Markets Securities Inc. (f/k/a RBS Securities Inc.), John Does 1-50, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund. (Burke, Christopher) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Burke, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Designated Activity Company, Bank of America, N.A., John Does 1-50, Merrill Lynch International, NatWest Markets plc, Natwest Markets Securities Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16548101)Document filed by Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund.(Burke, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.