Naji v. Cioppa et al
Ameen M Naji |
Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN, USCIS, Thomas Cioppa, Director Lee Francis Cissna, Department Of Homeland Security and Barbara Owlett |
1:2019cv02696 |
March 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Thomas Cioppa, Barbara Owlett, Lee Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Neilsen, DHS, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Ameen M Naji. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Proposed Summons for Defendant Cissna, #2 Appendix Proposed Summons for Defendant DHS, #3 Appendix Proposed Summons for Defendant Cioppa, #4 Appendix Proposed Summons for Defendant Owlett)(Langer, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to USCIS, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Ameen M Naji. (Langer, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Langer, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16565250)Document filed by Ameen M Naji. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, I-751 Receipt, #2 Exhibit Ex. B, N-400 Receipt, #3 Exhibit Ex. C, Naturalization Interview Results (N-652), #4 Exhibit Ex. D, Email from Senator Gillibrand)(Langer, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.