Montoya-Ibarra v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2019cv03793
Filed: April 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Victor Marrero
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2019 Mailed a copy of #4 Order of Dismissal, to Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra Reg. No. 24303-047 Moshannon Valley Corection Center 555 Geo Drive Philipsburg, PA 16866-8139. (vba)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: that the Clerk of Court is directed to open a new civil case under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Once the new civil case is opened, the Clerk of Court shall docket in that case the following documents from this case (09-CR-911-4): Docket Numbers 82, 83, and 84; ORDERED that the motions (Dkt. Nos. 82, 83 and 84) of defendant Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra ("Montoya-Ibarra") for a sentence reduction, pursuant to Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c) (2), relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, and "expedited consideration" of his motions, are hereby DENIED. As Montoya-Ibarra has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. Section 2253(c) (1)(B). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any pending motions and to close this case. Finally, the Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Montoya-Ibarra, noting service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 4/26/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
April 26, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION OF COURSE. Document filed by Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra. (sac)
April 26, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION re: EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION. Document filed by Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra. (sac)
April 26, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 1:09-cr-00911-VM-4. Document filed by Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra. (sac)
April 26, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sac)
April 26, 2019 Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montoya-Ibarra v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Ruben Montoya-Ibarra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?