Sarkar v. City of New York et al
| Jay Sarkar |
| Richard Condon, City of New York, Richard A. Carranza, New York City Department of Education, Kim Nohavicka, The Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District, Antoinette Bello and Barbara Hanson |
| 1:2019cv04040 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1932 bv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Antoinette Bello, Richard A. Carranza, City of New York, Richard Condon, Barbara Hanson, New York City Department of Education, Kim Nohavicka. (rdz)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Antoinette Bello, Richard A. Carranza, City of New York, Richard Condon, Barbara Hanson, New York City Department of Education, Kim Nohavicka, The Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District. (Filing Fee $ $400.00, Receipt Number 465401234812)Document filed by Jay Sarkar.(rdz)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
|
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
