Enriquez v. Nabriva Therapeutics plc et al
Larry Enriquez |
Nabriva Therapeutics plc and Ted Schroeder |
Anthony Manna |
1:2019cv04183 |
May 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Victor Marrero |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tamar Batya Kaplan-Marans on behalf of Nabriva Therapeutics plc, Ted Schroeder. (Kaplan-Marans, Tamar) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael G. Bongiorno on behalf of Nabriva Therapeutics plc, Ted Schroeder. (Bongiorno, Michael) |
Filing 6 ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate these actions for pretrial purposes; and it is further ORDERED that all filings in connection with the consolidated action be docketed against the remaining lower numbered case, 19 Civ. 4183; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk of Court close the referenced higher numbered case, 19 Civ. 4713, as a separate action andremove it from the Court's docket. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 5/24/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-04183-VM, 1:19-cv-04713-VM(cf) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Nabriva Therapeutics plc waiver sent on 5/17/2019, answer due 7/16/2019; Ted Schroeder waiver sent on 5/17/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. Document filed by Larry Enriquez. (Portnoy, Lesley) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nabriva Therapeutics plc, Ted Schroeder. (dnh) |
Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Lesley Frank Portnoy. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code XX Out of U.S.. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (dnh) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Lesley Frank Portnoy. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Larry Enriquez. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (dnh) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Victor Marrero. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NABRIVA THERAPEUTICS PLC and TED SCHROEDER, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Larry Enriquez. (Portnoy, Lesley) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Portnoy, Lesley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nabriva Therapeutics plc, Ted Schroeder. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16849369)Document filed by Larry Enriquez.(Portnoy, Lesley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.