Remer v. Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. et al
| Fred Remer |
| James A. DePalma, Robert V. Lapenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. and Charles J. Schafer |
| 1:2019cv04252 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER GOVERNING THE FILING AND BRIEFING OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT: NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court, as follows: 1. Within 10 days after the mediation, the Parties will file a joint report with the Court regarding the status of the case. If the Parties report that the mediation was unsuccessful, then the Parties agree to the following schedule: a. Lead Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after filing of the joint report to the Court to file an Amended Complaint. b. Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after Lead Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint to file a response thereto. c. Should Defendants file a motion to dismiss or a motion to transfer, Lead Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after Defendants file their motion to file an answering brief in opposition to Defendants' motion. d. Defendants shall have forty-five (45) days after Lead Plaintiff files an opposition brief to file their reply brief in further support of their motion. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/22/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00980-JPO, 1:19-cv-02308-JPO, 1:19-cv-04252-JPO(js)
|
| Filing 17 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by James A. DePalma, Robert V. LaPenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer. (Yu, Joseph) |
|
Filing 16
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER GOVERNING THE FILING AND BRIEFING OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Lead Plaintiff and Defendants, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: The Parties will be attempting to mediate this case on September 26, 2019. Within 10 days after the mediation, the Parties will file a joint report with the Court regarding the status of the case. If the Parties report that the mediation was unsuccessful, then the Parties agree to the following schedule: Lead Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after filing of the joint report to the Court to file an Amended Complaint. Defendants shall have sixty (60) days after Lead Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint to file a response thereto. c. Should Defendants file a motion to dismiss or a motion to transfer, Lead Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after Defendants file their motion to file an answering brief in opposition to Defendants' motion. d. Defendants shall have forty-five (45) days after Lead Plaintiff files an opposition brief to file their reply brief in further support of their motion. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/2/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-00980-JPO, 1:19-cv-02308-JPO, 1:19-cv-04252-JPO(js)
|
| Filing 15 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by James A. DePalma, Robert V. LaPenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer. (Yu, Joseph) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion to Consolidate Cases. For the reasons given in the Opinion and Order issued today in Glavan v. Revolution Lighting Technologies, No. 19 Civ. 980, Fred Remers motion to consolidate this action together with the actions that have now been consolidated as "In re: REVOLUTION LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION" under No. 19 Civ. 980 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 11 and to consolidate this action with the other actions that have been consolidated under No. 19 Civ. 980. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/29/2019) (cf)
|
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. #13 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. (km) |
| CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: Create association to 1:19-cv-00980-JPO. (cf) |
| Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Fred Remer. Related Document Number: #11 . (Gonnello, Richard) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #11 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:19-cv-00980-JPO; 1:19-cv-02308-JPO; 1:19-cv-04252-JPO . . Document filed by Fred Remer. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:19-cv-00980-JPO; 1:19-cv-02308-JPO; 1:19-cv-04252-JPO . Document filed by Fred Remer.(Gonnello, Richard) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants shall not be required to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the pending complaint until after the appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff's counsel; and, 2. Within 10 days after the appointment by the Court of a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"), the parties will present to the Court a proposed schedule for the filing of an amended complaint and defendants' response thereto. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 7/25/2019) (ks)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Fred Remer. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. James A. DePalma waiver sent on 7/18/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Document filed by Fred Remer. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Charles J. Schafer waiver sent on 7/18/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Document filed by Fred Remer. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Robert V. Lapenta waiver sent on 7/18/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Document filed by Fred Remer. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. waiver sent on 7/18/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. Document filed by Fred Remer. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:19-cv-00980-JPO. Notice of Assignment to follow. (jc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (jc) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jc) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 19-cv-00980. Document filed by Fred Remer.(Gonnello, Richard) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Richard William Gonnello. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Fred Remer. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RELATED CASE STATEMENT. Notice to attorney Richard William Gonnello to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Statement of Relatedness. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the related case statement is not correct;. Re-file the document using the event type Statement of Relatedness found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer - enter the related case number when prompted - and attach the correct PDF. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (jgo) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge J. Paul Oetken as possibly related to 19-cv-980. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:19-cv-00980 (JPO); 1:19-cv-02308 (JPO); and 1:19-cv-02722 (JPO). Document filed by Fred Remer.(Gonnello, Richard) Modified on 5/13/2019 (jgo). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Gonnello, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James A. DePalma, Robert V. Lapenta, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Charles J. Schafer. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16860693)Document filed by Fred Remer.(Gonnello, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
