Rodriguez v. Berryhill
| Carmen M Rodriguez |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv04466 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katharine H Parker |
| Gregory H Woods |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/28/2019) (mro) |
Filing 11
ORDER: On June 10, 2019 the Court directed the parties to confer as to whether they consent to proceeding before the assigned Magistrate Judge, and to submit either an executed consent form or a joint letter no later than June 24, 2019. Dkt. No. 10. Neither document has been submitted. Accordingly, the parties are directed to comply with the Courts June 10, 2019 order forthwith, and in no event later than June 28, 2019. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/26/2019) (jca)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for the defendant must, within two weeks of the date of this order file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this order (and also available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate-judge); and as further set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/10/2019) (anc) Modified on 6/11/2019 (anc).
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Susan Colleen Branagan on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill. (Branagan, Susan) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASE: This case has been referred to me for a report and recommendation. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, has brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking review of a denial of social security disability benefits. This Order supersedes all prior scheduling orders in this action. Plaintiff shall promptly serve the summons and complaint in the manner required by Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 20 C.F.R. 423.1. Plaintiff shall file proof of service within 90 days after filing the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the dismissal of this case; as further set forth herein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 5/21/2019) (mro)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/21/209) (anc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Commissioner of Social Security shall file an Electronic Certified Administrative Record (e-CAR) on the date on which it files its answer or other responsive pleading. If the Commissioner wishes to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, any other motion, or a stipulation to remand to the Commissioner, the Commissioner shall do so within thirty (30) days from the filing of the answer and the e-CAR. If Plaintiff wishes to file a cross-motion, Plaintiff must do so within thirty days after the Commissioner's filing of a motion. Opposition to any motion shall be filed within thirty days from service of the motion. Any reply must be filed within fourteen days thereafter. Any motion or opposition must be accompanied by a supporting memorandum of law and include specific citation to the parts of the record on which the party relies. Requests for an extension of any of the dates set forth herein must be made in accordance with the Court's Individual Rule 1(E). In addition, if the Commissioner anticipates that the Commissioner will require an extension of the date by which it must file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, any other motion, or a stipulation of remand to the Commissioner, the Commissioner should request the extension no less than two business days prior to the filing of the e-CAR and answer or other responsive pleading. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/21/2019) (anc)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (pc)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nancy A. Berryhill. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joseph Albert Romano. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Carmen M Rodriguez, Nancy A. Berryhill. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly;. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Romano, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nancy A. Berryhill, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Carmen M Rodriguez. (Romano, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16896475)Document filed by Carmen M Rodriguez.(Romano, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
