Gayle v. Hearst Communications Inc.
Plaintiff: Itoffee R. Gayle
Defendant: Hearst Communications Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv04699
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 CASE DECLINED AS NOT RELATED. Case referred as related to 18-cv-3774 and declined by Judge Ronnie Abrams and returned to wheel for assignment. (jc)
July 11, 2019 Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jc)
July 11, 2019 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (jc)
July 11, 2019 Letter sent to Pro Se Plaintiff Itoffee R. Gayle at 2010 Powell Ave., Apt. 2F, Bronx, NY 10472 re: Notice of Assignment/Reassignment on 7/11/19. (jc)
July 2, 2019 Mailed a copy of #8 Order Granting IFP Application to Itoffee R. Gayle 2010 Powell Avenue Apt. 2F Bronx, NY 10472. (vba)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 6/26/2019) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
June 4, 2019 Filing 7 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 18-cv-3774 (RA). Document filed by Hearst Communications Inc..(Boyer, Nathaniel)
June 4, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nathaniel Scott Boyer on behalf of Hearst Communications Inc.. (Boyer, Nathaniel)
June 4, 2019 Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Hearst Corporation for Hearst Communications Inc.. Document filed by Hearst Communications Inc..(Donnellan, Jonathan)
June 4, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan R. Donnellan on behalf of Hearst Communications Inc.. (Donnellan, Jonathan)
May 29, 2019 Filing 3 AFFIRMATION(Affidavit) OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Hearst Communications Inc., served on 5/22/2019, answer due 6/12/2019. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Itoffee R. Gayle. (sc)
May 21, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Hearst Communications Inc. Document filed by Itoffee R. Gayle. (sac)
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Itoffee R. Gayle. (sac)
May 21, 2019 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gayle v. Hearst Communications Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hearst Communications Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan R. Donnellan
Represented By: Nathaniel Scott Boyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Itoffee R. Gayle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?