Snyder v. Metro-North Railroad Company
| Raymond Snyder |
| Metro-North Railroad Company |
| 1:2019cv04719 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| William H Pauley |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RULE 26(f) DISCOVERY PLAN REPORT.Document filed by Raymond Snyder.(Cahill, George) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Answer and Rule 7.1 Statement served on George J. Cahill, Jr. on June 25, 2019. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Metro-North Railroad Company. (Muraidekh, Alan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by Metro-North Railroad Company.(Muraidekh, Alan) |
| Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Metro-North Railroad Company.(Muraidekh, Alan) |
Filing 5
ORDER FOR INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 8/7/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 20B, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge William H. Pauley III. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 6/5/2019) (ks)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Metro-North Railroad Company. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge William H. Pauley, III. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Metro-North Railroad Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Raymond Snyder. (Cahill, George) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Cahill, George) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metro-North Railroad Company. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16934818)Document filed by Raymond Snyder.(Cahill, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Snyder v. Metro-North Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metro-North Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Alan Muraidekh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Snyder | |
| Represented By: | George Joseph Cahill, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
