S. Clark et al v. Corporate Express, Inc. et al
Mark S. Clark |
Daniel Conte, Angel Ortiz, Robert De Domenico, Corporate Express, Inc. and Anthony Doe |
1:2019cv04983 |
May 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gregory H Woods |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER FOR CASES FILED UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq. This case, involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., has been assigned to this Court for all purposes. In the Courts experience, cases involving FLSA claims often benefit from early mediation. To that end, prior to a Rule 16(b) case management conference the Court is referring this case to the Mediation Office for settlement purposes under Local Civil Rule 83.9. To facilitate mediation the parties shall, within four weeks of this Order, confer and provide the items set forth in this Order. Mediator to be Assigned by 8/1/2019. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 09/07/2016) (rpr) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application granted. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to August 19, 2019. SO ORDERED. (Daniel Conte answer due 8/19/2019; Corporate Express, Inc. answer due 8/19/2019; Robert De Domenico answer due 8/19/2019; Angel Ortiz answer due 8/19/2019.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/22/2019) (anc) |
Filing 18 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Jeffrey Douglas dated 07/18/2019. Document filed by Daniel Conte, Corporate Express, Inc., Robert De Domenico, Angel Ortiz.(Douglas, Jeffrey) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Philip K Davidoff on behalf of Daniel Conte, Corporate Express, Inc., Robert De Domenico, Angel Ortiz. (Davidoff, Philip) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Douglas on behalf of Daniel Conte, Corporate Express, Inc., Robert De Domenico, Angel Ortiz. (Douglas, Jeffrey) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Alan Tannenbaum on behalf of Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Tannenbaum, Daniel) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Daniel Conte served on 6/27/2019, answer due 7/18/2019. Service was accepted by Semone Sobreno, a domestic employee of defendant. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually); Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Corporate Express, Inc. served on 6/17/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, an authorized agent. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually); Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Robert De Domenico. (pne) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Daniel Conte. (pne) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Corporate Express, Inc.. (pne) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Anthony Doe. (pne) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Angel Ortiz. (pne) |
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Anthony Doe, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Angel Ortiz, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Daniel Conte, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Robert De Domenico, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Corporate Express, Inc. (d/b/a Corporate Express), re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated). (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Faillace, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel Conte, Corporate Express, Inc., Robert De Domenico, Anthony Doe, Angel Ortiz. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16978445)Document filed by Mark S. Clark(individually), Mark S. Clark(on behalf of others similarly situated).(Faillace, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.