Signify North America Corporation et al v. Axis Lighting Inc.
Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V. |
Axis Lighting Inc. |
1:2019cv05516 |
June 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Denise L Cote |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to Axis Lighting Inc. (km) |
Filing 11 AFFIRMATION of Naresh Kilaru in Support re: #8 Affidavit of Service Complaints,. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Kilaru, Naresh) |
Filing 10 PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Kilaru, Naresh) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Clerk's Certificate of Default) (Kilaru, Naresh) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 7/26/2019 (dt). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT: Notice to Attorney Naresh Kilaru. RE-FILE Document No. #9 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the proposed clerk's certificate of default is the wrong document; Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default found under the event list Proposed Orders - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF that - lists the correct filed date of the complaint, lists the correct name(s) of the party(ies) who was/were served, lists the correct date the party(ies) was/were served, lists the correct filed date of the proof of service, then separately file the Affirmation using the event type Affirmation in Support of a Non-Motion,found under the event list Other Answers. (dt) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Axis Lighting Inc. served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. Service was accepted by Camelia Vizitiu - Department Human Resources. Document filed by Signify North America Corporation; Signify Holding B.V.. (Kilaru, Naresh) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Denise L. Cote, Patent Judge. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer is no longer assigned to the case. (ma) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Axis Lighting Inc.. (jgo) |
Filing 6 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (jgo) |
Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Naresh Kilaru. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Axis Lighting Inc., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Kilaru, Naresh) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Signify N.V. for Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Document filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation.(Kilaru, Naresh) |
Filing 3 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review.(Kilaru, Naresh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Kilaru, Naresh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Axis Lighting Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17079896)Document filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Kilaru, Naresh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.